Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Woodcrest Real Estate Ventures v. County of Lassen, a
as 2:2021at00079
Defendant:
Chris Gallagher, David Teeter, Jagpreet Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Woodcrest Real Estate Ventures, a division of Woodcrest Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woodcrest Real Estate Ventures v. County of Lassen
as 2:2021cv00171
Defendant:
County of Lassen, Chris Gallagher, David Teeter and others
Plaintiff:
Woodcrest Real Estate Ventures
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rice v. County of Lassen
as 2:2020cv02427
Defendant:
County of Lassen, Elizabeth Krier, Department of Child Support Services and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Rice and A. R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rice v. County of Lassen
as 1:2020at00992
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LASSEN, ELIZABETH KRIER and KELLEY COTE
Plaintiff:
Brent RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bland v. District Attorney's Office of the County of Lassen et al
as 1:2020cv00296
Defendant:
Robert Jordan Funk, District Attorney's Office of the County of Lassen and Susan Melyssah Rios
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis Bland and Joshua Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016at01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. County of Lassen, et. al.
as 2:2012cv01946
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stone
Defendant:
County of Lassen, Jim Chapman, Robert Pyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
