Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv06089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chipres Torres v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2023cv03494
Plaintiff:
Jose Faustino Chipres Torres
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Alameda County Sheriffs Office, County of Marin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Eggink v. County of Marin et al
as 3:2022cv07719
Plaintiff:
Cynthis Eggink
Defendant:
County of Marin, Marin County Sheriff's Department and Michael Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Camacho v. Buccholz et al
as 3:2022cv07656
Plaintiff:
Jose Cesar Camacho
Defendant:
Peri Buccholz, Brenton Shcnieder, Robert T. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
David Moses v. County of Marin, et al
as 22-16526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JOHN MOSES
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MARIN, SAN RAFAEL POLICE and CENTRAL MARIN POLICE AUTHORITY
Madeux v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2022cv04292
Plaintiff:
Teri Madeux
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, County of Marin and City of Novato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seaplane Adventures, LLC v. County of Marin
as 22-15027
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SEAPLANE ADVENTURES, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF MARIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
