Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ventura County Medi-Cal Managed Care Commission d/b/a Gold Coast Health Plan v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019op46020
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Ventura County Medi-Cal Managed Care Commission d/b/a Gold Coast Health Plan
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Ventura v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45747
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: County of Ventura
Cause Of Action: - Tort Negligence
County of Ventura v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv06799
Defendant: Specgx, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff: County of Ventura
Cause Of Action: - Tort Negligence
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00056
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: David Daleiden, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al
as 3:2019mc80042
Defendant: David Daleiden, Sandra Merritt, Biomax Procurement Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Center For Choice, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Planned Parenthood Orange & San Bernardino Counties, Inc. and others
Respondent: StemExpress, LLC, Sarah Heuston
Receiver: Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc., Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc. doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00009
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: Troy Newman, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, Gerardo Lopez Lopez and others
Receiver: Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc., Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. Doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California
Respondent: StemExpress, LLC, Sarah Heuston
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax
as 2:2019at00042
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: Troy Newman, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, Gerardo Lopez Lopez and others
Receiver: Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc., Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. Doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California
PERALES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv02268
Plaintiff: AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DESERT-MOUNTAIN REGION -- BARSTOW OFFICE, OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16997
Plaintiff - Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., DBA Planned Parenthood Northern California, PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis and others
Defendant: TROY NEWMAN, PHILLIP S. CRONIN
Defendant - Appellee: ALBIN RHOMBERG
Elofson v. Bivens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv05761
Plaintiff: Greg Elofson
Defendant: Stephanie Bivens, Stephanie Mccollum, Lawrence Scaringelli and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?