Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 1:2024cv03862
Plaintiff:
Gregoy D Jones
Defendant:
Judge Hooker, 4th Distr Cppt-Cpt- Clerk (J Doe) or rep. and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramones Productions, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03875
Plaintiff:
Ramones Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 897 sold Store, Adam Diary Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Graham v. Special Management Review Committee et al
as 1:2021cv03775
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
Special Management Review Committee, D. Altizer, Cpt. Unknown Leonowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis, Sr. v. Sheriff et al
as 3:2020cv00514
Defendant:
Sgt. Roberts, Sgt. Berday, Jeff Bullard, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Andre G Lewis, Sr. and Andre G Lewis, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Due v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2019cv01218
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Associate Warden Messer, Warden Werlich and others
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kersten et al
as 3:2018cv01436
Defendant:
State's Attorney Bloodworth, Cpl. Swift, Mr. Brashears and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gborplay v. Barnhill et al
as 3:2017cv00155
Plaintiff:
Owen M. Gborplay
Defendant:
Sgt. Barnhill, Cpt. Meadors, Warden Acuff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Salas et al
as 1:2016cv04386
Plaintiff:
Shariff Kente Miller
Defendant:
CPT Salas, Officer Annenopolis, Lt. Burnings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sharples v. Anderson et al
as 1:2009cv05124
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Sharples
Defendant:
Sup. Anderson, Cpt. Darcy, Sgt. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
