Cases 21 - 30 of 235
Alvin Dalton v. Craig Koenig
as 22-15229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN DALTON
Defendant / Appellee:
CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden, Warden
Gary Bernard Parker v. Craig Koenig et al
as 5:2022cv00323
Petitioner:
Gary Bernard Parker
Respondent:
Craig Koenig and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Koenig et al
as 4:2022cv00870
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Powell
Defendant:
Craig Koenig and L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Koenig et al
as 5:2022cv00881
Plaintiff:
Lamarr F Brown
Defendant:
Warden Craig Koenig and L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Posson et al
as 5:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Glenn Davis
Defendant:
S. Posson, M. Sweet, Steven Posson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin Royal v. Craig Koenig
as 22-15099
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARTIN D. ROYAL
Respondent / Appellee:
CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden
Dalton v. Koenig
as 4:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Alvin Henry Dalton
Defendant:
Warden Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv09741
Plaintiff:
Trevillion Ward
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Koenig Craig, K. Mensing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philip Hanes v. Craig Koenig, et al
as 21-56360
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILIP HANES
Respondent / Appellee:
CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden and RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Williams et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2021cv09586
Plaintiff:
Mr. Talib Williams and Dimario Pickford
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR Kathleen Allison, Warden Craig Koenig and others
Intervenor:
Milton William
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
