Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Scott v. Burdick et al
as 9:2018cv00405
Defendant:
Marcy Correctional Facility, Dr. Burdick and Justin Thomas
Plaintiff:
Craig Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferris et al v. Wynn Resorts Limited et al
as 1:2018cv01549
Plaintiff:
John V. Ferris and JoAnn M. Ferris
Defendant:
Wynn Resorts Limited, Stephen A. Wynn, Craig Scott Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Craig Scott Capital, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04757
Defendant:
Craig Scott Capital, LLC, Brent M. Porges and Craig S. Taddonio
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Those Certain Interested Underwriters At Lloyd's, London, Who Subscribed To Policy No. PE1500778 v. Craig Scott Capital LLC et al
as 2:2015cv05962
Defendant:
Afco Credit Corporation, Afco Premium Credit LLC, Donald Bankston and others
Plaintiff:
Those Certain Interested Underwriters At Lloyd's, London, Who Subscribed To Policy No. PE1500778
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Briggs et al v. Craig Scott Capital,LLC et al
as 1:2015mc00146
Petitioner:
James R Briggs and Louisa B. Briggs
Respondent:
Craig Scott Capital,LLC, Brookstone Securites, Inc, David Charles Cannata and others
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Briggs et al v. Craig Scott Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2015mc00883
Plaintiff:
James R. Briggs and Louisa B. Briggs
Defendant:
Brookstone Securities, Inc., David Charles Cannata, Craig Scott Capital, LLC and others
Scott v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02359
Plaintiff:
Craig Scott
Defendant:
City of New York, Dora B. Schriro, Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Hufford et al
as 1:2013cv03159
Petitioner:
Craig Scott
Respondent:
Hufford and K. Angeloni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
