Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Crocs, Inc. v. Daiso California LLC et al
as 5:2022cv03526
Plaintiff: Crocs, Inc.
Defendant: Daiso California LLC, Daiso Holding USA, Inc. and Daiso Industries Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Crocs, Inc. v. La Modish Boutique et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv05641
Plaintiff: Crocs, Inc.
Defendant: La Modish Boutique, Legend Footwear, Inc. d/b/a Wild DIva and Legend Footwear, Inc. doing business as Wild Diva
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. v. Crocs, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02054
Defendant: Crocs, Inc., Kelly Gray, Kim Lawrie and others
Plaintiff: U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
NOT USED
as 2:2016cv01693
Defendant: Crocs, Inc. and Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd.
Plaintiff: U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. et al v. Crocs, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01694
Defendant: Crocs, Inc.
Plaintiff: Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd. and U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Columbia Sportswear Company et al v. Crocs, Inc
as 3:2009cv00302
Plaintiff: Columbia Sportswear Company, Columbia Sportswear Company, Sorel Corporation and others
Defendant: Crocs, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?