Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Socorro Pacheco Arciga et al v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company et al
as 2:2019cv03700
Plaintiff:
Socorro Arciga, Kimberly Ann Adams, Amy Gilmore and others
Defendant:
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, United Talc Company, Metropolitan Talc Company, Inc. and others
Estate Plaintiff:
John Currie
Petitioner:
Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CURRY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45107
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR D. CURRY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CURRY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv44575
Plaintiff:
LEONARD J. CURRY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CURRIE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41728
Plaintiff:
ROLAND W. CURRIE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GRANT et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63847
Plaintiff:
URAL LIDDELL GRANT and MYRTLE CURRY
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEYWARD v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63328
Plaintiff:
CURRY HEYWARD
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURRY v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2011cv63180
Plaintiff:
HEYWARD CURRY
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., GAF CORP., KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURRY v. KEENE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv60549
Plaintiff:
TERRY CURRY
Defendant:
KEENE CORPORATION , NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY , NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURRY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54843
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA CURRY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CURRY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53056
Plaintiff:
HERBERT CURRY, JR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
