Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Curry v. Newsom et al
as 3:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
Marcus Curry
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Kathleen Allison and J. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2021cv00940
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Currie and Steven Currie
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
Perkins v. Classification Service Dept et al
as 3:2019cv01382
Defendant:
Classification Service Dept, DOES 1-10, Raymond Madden and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Ronnell Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Curry, Jr. et al v. Novo Nordisk Inc.
as 3:2016cv02880
Plaintiff:
George T. Curry and Lisa A. Curry
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams, et al. v. Astrazeneca, et al.
as 3:2012cv03083
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Adams , Debra Akins , Mary Allen and others
Defendant:
Astrazeneca LP and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Toledo et al v. Curry et al
as 3:2012cv02558
Plaintiff:
Noe Toledo and Christian Magadan
Defendant:
Tony Curry, Department of The Navy , United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Morris et al v. National Football League et al
as 3:2012cv02077
Plaintiff:
Eugene E. Morris , Ross W. Fichtner , Karen Fichtner and others
Defendant:
National Football League , NFL Properties LLC , Riddell, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Harris v. Curry et al
as 3:2010cv00966
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Harris
Respondent:
Ben Curry and Edmund G. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guardado v. Hoshino et al
as 3:2009cv02913
Petitioner:
Paul Albert Guardado
Respondent:
M Hoshino, M Cate, B Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rembao v. Curry
as 3:2009cv02632
Petitioner:
Humberto Rembao
Respondent:
B Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
