Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Echelon Stone CO. Inc. et al v. Adapthealth, LLC
as 1:2022cv01511
Plaintiff:
Echelon Stone CO. Inc., Echelon Partners, LLC and Donald W. Curry
Defendant:
Adapthealth, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams, Mike Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00762
Plaintiff:
Sarrah Adams, Levi Allen, Kimberly Alverson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Curry v. Curry III
as 1:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
Erin Curry
Defendant:
William Curry III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Default
Flowers v. The State of Delaware et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
King James Albert Flowers and King - Joshua
Defendant:
The State of Delaware, The Soverreign Jurisdiction of The Federal Court of Delaware State, The Governors Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Crowley v. Bojangles, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01993
Defendant:
John E. Currie, Tommy L. Haddock, Steven M. Tadler and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Crowley
Shibata v. Bojangles', Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01986
Defendant:
John E. Currie, Bojangles', Inc., Steven M. Tadler and others
Plaintiff:
Junji Shibata
Franchi v. Bojangles', Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01981
Defendant:
John E. Currie, Steven M. Tadler, Christopher J. Doubrava and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Kasper v. Bojangles', Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01961
Defendant:
John E. Currie, Bojangles', Inc., Steven M. Tadler and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kasper
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
