Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01933
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Curry v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2018cv01299
Petitioner:
Steven Duane Curry
Respondent:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01271
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Berthiaume, Annette Campbell, Joanne Cooper and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., Chemguard, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stacy et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 1:2018cv01193
Plaintiff:
Michael Hybert, Robin McGaughey, Cleveland Holloway and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., Kidde Fire Fighting, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Builders Insurance Group, Inc. v. Zag Built, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01326
Plaintiff:
Builders Insurance Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Zag Built, LLC , Mike Zagrzebski , Brock Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ohlson v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2017cv00796
Plaintiff:
Keith Ohlson
Defendant:
State of Colorado, County of Arapahoe, City of Centennial and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Curry v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2016cv01077
Plaintiff:
Steven Duane Curry
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fresquez v. Webber et al
as 1:2015cv02384
Plaintiff:
Leroy D. Fresquez
Defendant:
Jim Webber, Paul Hallenbeck, John Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rothrock v. Curry, M.D., et al
as 1:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
James Rothrock and James (I) Rothrock
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Curry, Stephanie Schlenger and UCH-MHS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
