Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sibley v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv07697
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Sibley and Maria Sibley
Defendant:
Blackmer Pump Company, EATON CORPORATION individually and sii to Vickers Pump;, VIKING PUMP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilgenbusch et al v. Fryer-Knowles, Inc., A Washington Corporation
as 4:2019cv05620
Plaintiff:
Judith A. Wilgenbusch and Ronald C. Wilgenbusch
Defendant:
Fryer-Knowles, Inc., A Washington Corporation, Darcoid Company of California, Lockheed Shipbuilding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Leavy et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01796
Plaintiff:
Linda Leavy , Dianne Boschee , Patricia Clark and others
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd., CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Luce et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv02111
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Luce and Jean Luce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Powers v. Allis Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust et al
as 4:2010cv01921
Defendant:
Viacom Inc., Square D Company, Yarway Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Olschewske et al v. Asbestos Defendants
as 3:2010cv01729
Defendant:
Standco, Inc., General Motors Corporation, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Olschewske, Ellamae Pike and Thomas R. Olschewske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Olschewske et al v. Asbestos Defendants
as 4:2010cv01729
Plaintiff:
Linda Olschewske , Thomas R. Olschewske and Ellamae Pike
Defendant:
Asbestos Defendants , Rockwell Automation, Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
