Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McCoy v. Brown et al
as 1:2018cv00545
Plaintiff:
Joseph Raymond McCoy
Defendant:
Gerald Brown, Cynthia Fritz, Joseph Haytas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 17-17449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Luis Johnson v. Joe Lizarraga, et al
as 17-16766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS R. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden and CYNTHIA FRITZ
Johnson v. Shaffer, et al.
as 2:2017cv00991
Plaintiff:
Oshay Johnson
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer, Cynthia Fritz, Stewart Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackmon v. Shaffer et al
as 7:2016cv07178
Plaintiff:
Bernard O. Jackmon
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer and Cynthia Fritz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bell v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2016cv02890
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Bell
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer, Cynthia Fritz and Mike Grottkau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Hawk v. CDCR, et al
as 16-16885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN HAWK
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, FORENSIC ASSESSMENT DIVISION and others
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 16-16500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Johnson v. Lisarraga et al
as 2:2016cv00253
Plaintiff:
Luis Reynaldo Johnson
Defendant:
Joe A Lisarraga and Cynthia Fritz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv02529
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Board of Parole Hearings, Forensic Assessment Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
