Cases 1 - 10 of 283
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
JULIE LYNCH, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, FREDERICK D. BENTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03277
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, CENTURY REGIONAL DET FACILITY, ANGELA D. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REYNOSO v. USA
as 1:2023cv03222
Petitioner:
MANUEL D. REYNOSO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GREESON v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
REMBERT D. GREESON
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NICOLESCU v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
BOGDAN NICOLESCU
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, M. D. CARAVAJAL, DAVID BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BRAXTON v. ELLIS
as 1:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
SUSAN D. ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. FOSTER
as 1:2023cv00757
Petitioner:
CARLOS D. COX, JR.
Respondent:
COREY FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DIXON v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00738
Not Classified By Court:
COLETTE S. PETERS
Plaintiff:
DIJON DIXON
Defendant:
EUGENE BAINE, J.C. PETRUCCI, MICHAEL FRAZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
CRAYTON v. FEAZELL
as 1:2023cv00633
Petitioner:
LEE D. CRAYTON
Respondent:
MICHAEL FEAZELL, KODY SCHUR and KAMILAH COGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
