Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Travis D. Arnold et al v. M. Rios et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Arnold, K. Oshiro, Sen. Ofcr. Danny Long and Spouse and others
Defendant:
Ms. M. Rios, B. Lammer, Lt. M. Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis D. Arnold v. B. Lammer et al
as 2:2022cv03894
Petitioner:
Travis D. Arnold
Respondent:
Complex Warden B. Lammer and A. W. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Travis D. Arnold v. Felipe Martinez
as 2:2020cv08694
Respondent:
Complex Warden Felipe Martinez, Jr.
Petitioner:
Travis D. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turner v. Artis et al
as 2:2013cv00944
Plaintiff:
Jason Turner
Defendant:
D. Artis, Vimal J. Singh, D. Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Artis, et al
as 2:2013cv00886
Plaintiff:
Charles C. James
Defendant:
D. Artis, Vimal J. Singh and D. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tran v. Aguirre et al
as 2:2012cv01243
Plaintiff:
Chu Tran
Defendant:
J. Aguirre, Youngblood, Hume and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El' Ali v. Greer et al
as 2:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Sheikh Muftii El' Ali
Defendant:
Fred Greer, M. Kimbriel, A. Bautista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tufono v. California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation Mule Creek State Prison et al
as 2:2009cv03372
Plaintiff:
Arvello L. Tufono
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation Mule Creek State Prison, M. Martel, G R Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tufono v. California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation Mule Creek State Prison et al
as 5:2008cv04580
Plaintiff:
Arvello L. Tufono
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation Mule Creek State Prison, M. Martel, G. R. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
