Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff: RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant: ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ATTORNEY BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00103
Plaintiff: RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant: ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bailey v. The United States of America
as 1:2020cv00496
Defendant: The United States of America
Plaintiff: Cynthia D. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Bailey v. The United States of America
as 1:2017cv03982
Plaintiff: Cynthia D. Bailey
Defendant: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Bailey v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00202
Plaintiff: Justin D. Bailey
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00163
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DUE vs. CAMP, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00087
Plaintiff: RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant: LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F A GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
DUE v. CAMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00082
Plaintiff: RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant: LAURIE SMITH CAMP, JOHN M GERRARD, F D GOSSETT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUE v. THALKEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff: RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant: THOMAS D THALKEN, JOSEPH F BATAILLON, KATHRYN KENEALLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01097
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?