Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Paulcin v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14319
Defendant:
Lee, Jane Doe, T Rawson and others
Plaintiff:
Prophet Paulcin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SELLERS et al.
as 5:2017cv00497
Plaintiff:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant:
ERIC SELLERS, CHARLES WOODALL, STEVE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Restricted Filer- Paulcin v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv22916
Plaintiff:
Prophet Restricted Filer - Paulcin
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Tom Reimers, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nairn Newell v. D. Snider, et al
as 16-11883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAIRN D. NEWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
D. SNIDER, Assistant Warden, Okeechobee, CI, INSPECTOR CARTER, Okeechobee, C. I., SERGEANT K. SANDERS, Okeechobee, C.I. and others
Newell v. Snider et al
as 2:2015cv14415
Petitioner:
Nairn D. Newell
Respondent:
D. Snider, Inspector Carter, K. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins et al v. Snider et al
as 2:2014cv14019
Plaintiff:
James A. Hawkins, Joseph Green and Evan Mitchell
Defendant:
D. Snider and P McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green et al v. Snider et al
as 2:2014cv14018
Plaintiff:
Joseph Green, James Hawkins and Evan Mitchell
Defendant:
D. Snider, R McCracken, P McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Stokes et al
as 2:2014cv14008
Plaintiff:
James A. Hawkins, Jr.
Defendant:
B.D. Stokes, D. Bevis, R. McCracken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. Brown et al
as 7:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
LORENZO JEROME PATTERSON
Defendant:
Terry Brown, A Terrell, Wize and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnnie Howard v. D. Snider, et al
as 13-10828
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHNNIE FITZGERALD HOWARD
Defendant - Appellant:
D. SNIDER, M. H. MEIER, S. M. LEAHEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
