Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jones v. Gruver et al
as 3:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Mr J Clark, Ms J Rodriguez, Mr R Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 4:2022cv04252
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, Warden R. Bowers, C Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2022cv02494
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, R Bowers, C Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Simmons
as 22-10901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
NFN Simmons, Captain, NFN Ward, Captain, D. Wonders and others
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv01882
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
R Bowers, D Wonders, J Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Moore et al
as 3:2022cv01270
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
R Moore, Director, TDCJ-CID, R Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv01055
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, D Blackshire, R Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Moore
as 22-10416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
R. Moore, P. Coleman, D. Wonders and others
Jones v. Simmons et al
as 3:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
NFN Simmons, NFN Ward, D Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Moore
as 22-10164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Rocky Moore, Head Warden, D. Wonders, Assistance Warden, J. Rodriguez, Major and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
