Cases 11 - 20 of 106
(PC) Martinez v. Baughman et al
as 1:2019cv01459
Defendant:
D. Baughman, D. Goss, Ken Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zane Hubbard v. M. Stainer, et al
as 19-16880
Defendant / Appellee:
R. GOODWIN, M. D. STAINER, SCOTT KERNAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZANE HUBBARD, AKA Zane Molina Hubbard
Kennard Davis, et al v. James Walker, et al
as 19-16616
Defendant:
TROY BRIMHALL, V, DUC, R. PENNINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER BROWN, Guardian Ad Litem for Kennard Lee Davis and RONNIE TOLLIVER, Guardian Ad Litem for Kennard Lee Davis
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, guardian ad litem Ronnie Tolliver
Defendant / Appellee:
DA ROSA, EDMONSON, S. FLORY and others
Zane Hubbard v. M. Stainer, et al
as 19-16271
Defendant / Appellee:
R. GOODWIN, M. D. STAINER, SCOTT KERNAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZANE HUBBARD
(PC) Hubbard v. Rogerds et al
as 1:2019cv00723
Defendant:
E. Rodriguez, D. Rogerds, W. Sampley and others
Plaintiff:
Zane Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Candler v. D. Baughman
as 2:2019cv04143
Plaintiff:
Keith Candler
Defendant:
D. Baughman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hubbard v. Stainer et al
as 1:2019cv00601
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, T. Lee, R. Goodwin and others
Plaintiff:
Zane Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Petillo v. Baughman et al
as 1:2019cv00493
Plaintiff:
Sidney Petillo
Defendant:
Herrera, D. Baughman, Clough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Petillo v. Baughman et al
as 2:2019cv00667
Plaintiff:
Sidney Petillo
Defendant:
Herrera, D. Baughman, Clough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gaddy v. C. Ducart, et al
as 19-15149
Defendant / Appellee:
D. HOTTINGER, Correctional Case Records Manager, D. BRADBURY, Warden, P. BADURA, Correctional Case Records Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN GADDY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
