Cases 1 - 10 of 85
(PC) Duncan v. Cisneros et al
as 2:2023cv02559
Plaintiff:
Diontae Johan Duncan
Defendant:
T. Cisneros, The California Healthcare Recivership Corp, Christopher Ukiomogbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaxiola v. Borla et al
as 3:2023cv02196
Plaintiff:
Joseph Emmanuel Gaxiola
Defendant:
E. Borla, D. Bright, Qingbo Sui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Peasley v. M. Spearman, et al
as 23-15471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT PEASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, D. BRIGHT, Chief Medical Officer, ZAHED AHMED, Doctor and others
David Peasley v. M. Spearman, et al
as 23-15177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT PEASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, D. BRIGHT, Chief Medical Officer, ZAHED AHMED, Doctor and others
Hartley v. Bright et al
as 5:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Roger Andrew Hartley
Defendant:
D.O. D. Bright, M.D. Joseph Bick, K. Kumar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Gamboa et al
as 3:2021cv02744
Defendant:
Hack, L. Gamboa and D. Bright
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallardo v. Bourne, MD et al
as 4:2020cv09184
Defendant:
B. Omosaiye, Waheed Ibrahimi, MD, K Bock and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Lewis Gallardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Walker v. Gates et al
as 2:2020cv02338
Defendant:
Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, N. Malakkla, A Abdulbasel and others
Plaintiff:
G. Daniel Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Atchley et al
as 3:2020cv06626
Defendant:
B. Omosaiye, M. Atchley, D. Bright and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Scott West v. S. Gates et al
as 2:2020cv05356
Plaintiff:
Joshua Scott West
Defendant:
Lawrence Gamboa, Dr. Noman, R. Abdelkarim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
