Cases 1 - 10 of 19
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 1:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Henry Christopher Stubbs, III
Defendant:
Gregory A. Skrepenak, Todd Vonderheid, Stephen A. Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 2:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
GREGORY A. SKREPENAK, TODD VONDERHEID, STEPHEN A. URBAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. SWANN et al
as 3:2020cv02378
Defendant:
Phippe, Hope L. Swann, Judge Krause and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Michael S Owlfeather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS et al v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv04348
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROOKS and MEAGAN D. BROOKS
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER A.G., BAYER ESSURE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv05422
Defendant:
D. BROOKS SMITH, STENGEL, KATE BARKMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY et al v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv04768
Plaintiff:
KAREN GRAVES, ALICIA TURNER, FELICIA SANDOVAL and others
Defendant:
BAYER ESSURE INC., BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KENNEDY v. LEESON et al
as 5:2018cv04414
Defendant:
D. BROOKS SMITH, JOSEPH F. LEESON, JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
NOBLE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv02420
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant:
D. BROOKS SMITH and KATE BARKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DARBY v. MCKEE et al
as 2:2016cv05246
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. DARBY
Defendant:
THEODORE A. MCKEE, THOMAS I. VANASKIE, D. MICHAEL FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
