Cases 1 - 10 of 12
William Dunne, et al v. Thahesha Jusino
as 21-56254
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM D. DUNNE
Petitioner:
THOMAS RICHARD FARRUGIA
Respondent / Appellee:
THAHESHA L. JUSINO
William Dunne v. T. Jusino
as 21-55507
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM D. DUNNE
Respondent / Appellee:
T. JUSINO, Warden
William Dunne v. G.J. Bissett
as 17-16231
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. DUNNE
Respondent - Appellee:
G.J. BISSETT
William Dunne v. USDC-SAC
as 16-73982
:
In re: WILLIAM D. DUNNE
Petitioner:
WILLIAM D. DUNNE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
G.J. BISSETT
John McKown, IV v. USA, et al
as 13-16099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN H. MCKOWN, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KENNETH L. SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture and others
Dunn et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv00519
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Dunn and Lolita Dunn
Defendant:
United States of America , Does 1-10 and Roe Corporations 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
William Dunne v. D. Smith, et al
as 11-16342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. DUNNE
Defendant - Appellee:
D. SMITH, B. AVALOS, J. KARGE and others
McKown v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv00810
Plaintiff:
John H. McKown, IV
Defendant:
United States of America, Kenneth Salazar, Thomas Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00732
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01864
Plaintiff:
Emma Allen, Emma Allen, Mirella G. Nocedo and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia Corporation and G.D. Searle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
