Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Dunigan v. United States of America, et al.
as 25-7036
Plaintiff:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
HOGAN v. IVEY, JR. et al
as 5:2025cv00284
Plaintiff:
RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant:
GEORGE IVEY, JR., JEREMY FOSTON, SHONTRELLE SWINT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Foston
as 1:2025cv03724
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dijon Foston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
HOGAN v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON et al.
as 5:2025cv00122
Plaintiff:
RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON, WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, JR, KATRINA D FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOSTIC v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2024cv00406
Defendant:
STAN SHEPARD, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Warden ANNETTIA TOBY and others
Plaintiff:
NORMAN BOSTIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunigan v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-6721
Defendant:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, J. BROWMAN, Dr., SMALLS, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Weaver v. Foston
as 1:2024cv04018
Petitioner:
Windell Weaver
Respondent:
Jeremy Foston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FULTON v. FOSTON et al
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
350621 RANDALL FULTON
Defendant:
MS MOSELEY, MS BONNER, JEREMY FOSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cra - Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
