Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Malcolm D. Hanson v. Tammy Campbell
as 2:2023cv03112
Petitioner:
Malcolm D. Hanson
Respondent:
Tammy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barry Woods v. D. Hanson, et al
as 22-17018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY DEWAYNE WOODS
Defendant / Appellee:
D. HANSON, Correctional Officer, R. BELL, Chief Deputy Warden, RICH, Canteen Staff and others
Woods v. Hanson et al
as 3:2022cv05104
Plaintiff:
Barry Dewayne Woods
Defendant:
Correctional Officer D. Hanson, Chief Deputy Warden R. Bell, Canteen Staff Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Goods v. Baughman et al
as 2:2020cv00416
Defendant:
K. Franceschi, Soltanian, Lim and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hanson v. Ferrara et al
as 2:2019cv01373
Defendant:
County of Solano, City of Fairfield and Thomas A. Ferrara
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hanson and Robert David Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Badger Medical et al
as 1:2019cv00080
Defendant:
Ashlee and Badger Medical
Plaintiff:
Malcolm D Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Summit Foods
as 1:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Summit Foods
Plaintiff:
Malcolm D Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Jerome County Detention Facility
as 1:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Jerome County Detention Facility and Summit Foods
Plaintiff:
Malcolm D Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Jerome County Detention Facility
as 1:2019cv00042
Petitioner:
Malcolm D Hanson
Respondent:
Jerome County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Lehman, et al v. Warner Nelson, et al
as 18-35321
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHARD LEHMAN, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and MICHAEL PUTERBAUGH
Defendant - Appellant:
WARNER NELSON, WILLIAM BECK, Jr., BRIAN BISH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
