Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MARCON & BOYER, INC. et al v. HUDSON
as 5:2018cv04057
Plaintiff:
DUGGAN & MARCON, INC., EASTERN EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS, INC., and MARCON & BOYER, INC.
Defendant:
ANDREW D. HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Holtzapple et al
as 3:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Scott Holtzapple, J. Butler, B. Trate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reaves v. Hudson
as 3:2014cv01325
Petitioner:
Harold Reaves
Respondent:
D. Hudson and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cardona v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Jose Cristobal Cardona
Defendant:
B.A. Bledsoe, D. Young, D. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Collins v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2012cv02244
Plaintiff:
Larry Joe Collins
Defendant:
B. A. Bledsoe, D. Hudson, J. Flemming and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ARD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04378
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ARD , MARTHA ARD , WILLIAM BANKS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2012cv01292
Plaintiff:
Easzs Harper
Defendant:
United States Of America, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Jeffrey Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2012cv01235
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Defendant:
Brian A. Bledsoe, John Adami, D. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Sutton-El v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2011cv02354
Defendant:
Brian A. Bledsoe, D. Hudson, D. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Sutton-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2011cv02266
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Richardson
Defendant:
Bryan A Bledsoe, Thomas R. Kane, Joseph Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
