Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Bannock County, Idaho
as 4:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Vawn D Smith
Defendant:
Bannock County, Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Howe, et al. v. Roberts, et al.
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Bridget Bade, Milan D Smith, Srikanth Srinivason and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ellis, Ebenezer K. Howe, IV and Robert McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 1:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc., Patrick D. Smith, City of Birmingham and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Canyon County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018cv00479
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma LP and others
Plaintiff:
Canyon County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Adams County et al v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00360
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Elmore County, Boise County, Latah County and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402
Smith v. Director of Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Richard D Smith
Defendant:
Director of Idaho Department of Corrections, Director of Idaho Board of Corrections, Director of Idaho Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harris v. Kootenai County et al
as 2:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Theodore D Harris
Defendant:
Kootenai County , Rocky Watson , Jane Doe Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago v. IMSI et al
as 1:2008cv00119
Plaintiff:
Joe Anthony Santiago
Defendant:
IMSI and D Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
