Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Armstrong v. Chapman et al
as 2:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Steven Matthew Armstrong
Defendant:
Travis Chapman, Nima Afshar, Haley Jaramillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Adams v. Ferenbach et al
as 2:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Brandon G. Adams and Brandon G Adams
Defendant:
Cam Ferenbach, Brenda Weksler, Debra K. Kempi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 3:2019cv00706
Defendant:
Patrick D. Smith, City of Birmingham and Birmingham, City of
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al
as 3:2019cv00560
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of and Patrick D. Smith
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cox et al
as 2:2018cv02061
Defendant:
James Cox, Hubbard Pickett, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Baker et al
as 2:2015cv00487
Respondent:
Renee Baker and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Montrail D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. City of North Las Vegas, Nevada et al
as 2:2013cv01150
Defendant:
City Attorney Jeffrey Barr, City of North Las Vegas, Nevada and North Las Vegas City Council
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. LeGrande et al
as 2:2012cv01260
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Robert LeGrande
Petitioner:
Michael D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Burns et al
as 3:2012cv00132
Respondent:
Warden Burns and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith vs Neven, et al
as 3:2011cv00531
Defendant:
Aranas, High Desert State Prison and Neven
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
