Cases 1 - 10 of 22
HATCHER et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Benjamin D. Hatcher, Carolyn J. Hatcher, BENJAMIN D HATCHER and others
Defendant:
Joseph D. Thompson, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and JOSEPH D THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Thompson v. EZ 2 Afford Cars
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Wanda D. Thompson
Defendant:
EZ 2 Afford Cars
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mesirov v. Fanning et al
as 1:2017cv01983
Plaintiff:
Judy Mesirov
Defendant:
Thomas A. Fanning , Art P. Beattie , Donald M. James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vinyard v. Fanning et al
as 1:2017cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jean Vinyard
Defendant:
Thomas A. Fanning , Arthur P. Beattie , Edward Day, VI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. COLVIN
as 5:2016cv00404
Plaintiff:
RANDALL D THOMPSON
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Crockett v. City of Stockbridge et al
as 1:2016cv01349
Plaintiff:
Henry D. Crockett
Defendant:
City of Stockbridge, Henry County Police Department, C. D. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON-LONG v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 3:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
SANDRA D THOMPSON-LONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
THOMPSON v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00473
Plaintiff:
EDNA D THOMPSON
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and MENTOR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. POPLAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00457
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
POPLAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC, RAHIL KAZI, DAVID D THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
