Cases
D.V.D., et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 26-1212
Plaintiff: D.V.D., M.M., E.F.D. and others
Defendant: US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security (DHS), PAMELA J. BONDI, United States Attorney General and others
Interested Party: NEW YORK TIMES, AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a ABC News, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION REFORM, THE FLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT, THE NATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER and others
D.V.D., et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 25-1631
Plaintiff: D.V.D., M.M., E.F.D. and others
Defendant: US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security (DHS), PAMELA J. BONDI, United States Attorney General and others
Interested Party: NEW YORK TIMES, AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a ABC News, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION REFORM and HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
D.V.D., et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 25-1393
Plaintiff: D.V.D., M.M., E.F.D. and others
Defendant: US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security (DHS), PAMELA J. BONDI, United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner: IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
D.V.D., et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 25-1311
Plaintiff: D.V.D., M.M., E.F.D. and others
Defendant: US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security (DHS), PAMELA J. BONDI, United States Attorney General and others
D.V.D. et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2025cv10676
Plaintiff: D.V.D., M.M., E.F.D. and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, Pamela Bondi and others
Intervenor: The New York Times Company, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. d/b/a ABC News, Cable News Network, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bassett v Blitt
as 1:2021cv10899
Defendant: Cameron Rose doing business as Colton Grey, John Doe #14 doing business as Magdeline St. Michaels, Vivid Canada Entertainment, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Leah Bassett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Albert Gray, et al v. Surplex Underwriters Inc.
as 08-1575
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALBERT L. GRAY, Administrator of the Estate of Derek J. Gray, and on behalf of J. L. G., minor child of the decedent, Derek J. Gray, JOANNE O'NIEL, Administratrix of the Estate of Nicholas O'Neil, MARIE G. MORTON, Administratrix of the Estate of Jason R. Morton, individually as wife and surviving spouse of the decedent Jason R. Morton, and as mother and next friend of K.M.M. and A.M.M., minor children of the decedent and others
Plaintiff: DAVID B. MACDONALD, individually, and as father and next friend of D. B. M., minor child of David B. MacDonald
Defendant: JEFFREY DERDERIAN, MICHAEL DERDERIAN, HOWARD JULIAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: SURPLEX UNDERWRITERS INC
: , and
Albert Gray, et al v. Surplex Underwriters Inc.
as 08-1575
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALBERT L. GRAY, Administrator of the Estate of Derek J. Gray, and on behalf of J. L. G., minor child of the decedent, Derek J. Gray, JOANNE O'NIEL, Administratrix of the Estate of Nicholas O'Neil, MARIE G. MORTON, Administratrix of the Estate of Jason R. Morton, individually as wife and surviving spouse of the decedent Jason R. Morton, and as mother and next friend of K.M.M. and A.M.M., minor children of the decedent and others
Plaintiff: DAVID B. MACDONALD, individually, and as father and next friend of D. B. M., minor child of David B. MacDonald
Defendant: JEFFREY DERDERIAN, MICHAEL DERDERIAN, HOWARD JULIAN and others
Defendant / Appellee: SURPLEX UNDERWRITERS INC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?