Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jaime Garcia-Ontiveros v. K. Dixon, et al
as 14-11295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAIME GARCIA-ONTIVEROS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. DIXON, Warden, H. BRYAN, Associate Warden and DALBY HEALTH SERVICE DOE 1-100
Sacramento Perez v. Dalby Health Service, et al
as 14-11137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SACRAMENTO PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DALBY HEALTH SERVICE, QUINTANA, Dalby Health Cordinator, KERRY DIXON, Warden and others
Alejandro Maldonado v. Giles W. Dalby Corrtl Facil, et al
as 14-10928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEJANDRO FIERRO MALDONADO
Defendant - Appellee:
GILES W. DALBY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DALBY HEALTH SERVICE and QUINTANA, Health Service Supervisor
Rodriguez v. McAdams et al
as 5:2014cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jose Artega Rodriguez
Defendant:
S McAdams, H Bryan and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palacios v. Bryan et al
as 5:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jose Aguirre Palacios
Defendant:
H Bryan and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bautista v. Luera et al
as 5:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roberto Bautista
Defendant:
C Luera, S McAdams and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montes v. McAdam et al
as 5:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Luigi Montes
Defendant:
S McAdam, H Bryan and Dalby Health Service Johan Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez-Barrada v. McAdams et al
as 5:2013cv00270
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gomez-Barrada
Defendant:
S McAdams, Dalby Health Service DOE 1-100 and H Bryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia-Ontiveros v. Dixon et al
as 5:2013cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jaime Garcia-Ontiveros
Defendant:
K. Dixon, H Bryan and Dalby Health Service DOE 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montoya-Olachia v. Brayn et al
as 5:2013cv00263
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Montoya-Olachia
Defendant:
H Brayn, L Bond, Dalby Health Service Staff Doe 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
