Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Dale Adams v. US Department of Defense, et al
as 16-41111
Plaintiff - Appellant: DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ASHTON B. CARTER, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Any Unknown Named Essential Parties and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS et al
as 1:2014cv01781
Plaintiff: DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS and PAUL K. HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Dale Adam
as 14-7062
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Dale B. Adams
Dale Adams v. Department of State, et al
as 13-5244
Plaintiff - Appellant: Dale B. Adams
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of State, Condoleezza Rice, Former United States Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton, United States Secretary of State and others
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01041
Plaintiff: DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, HILLARY R. CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dale Adams v. Dept. of Agriculture, et al
as 13-1209
Petitioner: Dale B. Adams
Respondent: United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J. Vilsack, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and others
ADAMS v. DOE
as 1:2013cv00157
Plaintiff: DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dale Adams v. DOS, et al
as 12-1439
Petitioner: Dale B. Adams
Respondent: United States Department of State and Hillary Rodham Clinton
In re: Dale Adam
as 12-5364
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Dale B. Adams
:
Dale Adams v. Department of State, et al
as 12-1429
Petitioner: Dale B. Adams
Respondent: United States Department of State and Hillary Rodham Clinton

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?