Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Douglas v. Young, et al.
as 25-5621
Plaintiff:
DAMEION DOUGLAS
Defendant:
STUART YOUNG, Assis. Admin. of Rel. Ser., DARYL BORELLO, Admin. of Rel. Ser., THOMPSON, Chaplain and others
Douglas v. Pearlstein, et al.
as 23-4303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMEION DOUGLAS
Defendant / Appellee:
A. PEARLSTEIN, KURUNA THOMPSON, MELISSA DAVIDSON and others
Douglas v. Young et al
as 6:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Dameion Douglas
Defendant:
Stuart Young, Daryl Borello, Chaplain Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Thompson et al
as 6:2020cv00546
Defendant:
Schow, Chaplain Karuna Thompson, David Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Dameion Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dameion Douglas v. Donald Reese, et al
as 18-35563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMEION DOUGLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD REESE, Multnomah County Prosecutor, JOHN DOE, Multnomah County Court Clerk and JOHN DOE
Douglas v. Pearlstein et al
as 6:2018cv00533
Defendant:
Melissa Davidson, John Doe, Dennis Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Dameion Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Kelly
as 6:2017cv00958
Petitioner:
Dameion Douglas
Respondent:
B. Kelly
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dameion Douglas v. Cruz, et al
as 17-35090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMEION DOUGLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CRUZ, Correctional Officer and HANSON, Grievance Coordinator
Douglas v. Premo
as 6:2016cv01497
Petitioner:
Dameion Douglas
Unknown:
Lisa Hay and Lynn David Larsen
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Reese et al
as 6:2016cv00048
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe and Donald Reese
Plaintiff:
Dameion Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
