Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SCHMIDT v. TYLER et al
as 3:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
DAN SCHMIDT
Defendant:
DAYNNA TYLER, KRISTA NAVARRO, JAMES WINTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dan Schmidt v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 13-13777
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAN SCHMIDT
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MONICA DAVID, FPC Commissioner and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
SCHMIDT v. RODRIGUES et al
as 3:2013cv00460
Plaintiff:
DAN SCHMIDT
Defendant:
RICHARD RODRIGUES, PORTSIDE CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, TIMOTHY J SLOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dan Schmidt v. Krista Navarro, et al
as 13-11496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
KRISTA NAVARRO, MITCH PITTS, Bay Co. Sheriff's Office Lieutenant Individually and/or Acting Under Color of State Law and JAMES WINTERS, Florida Department of Corrections Probation and Parole Agent Individually and/or Acting Under Color of State Law
Dan Schmidt v. Secretary, FL DOC, et al
as 12-15428
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAN SCHMIDT
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MONICA DAVID, FPC Commissioner and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
SCHMIDT v. TUCKER
as 5:2012cv00246
Petitioner:
DAN SCHMIDT
Respondent:
KENNETH S TUCKER and MONICA DAVID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCHMIDT v. TUCKER
as 5:2012cv00226
Petitioner:
DAN SCHMIDT
Respondent:
KENNETH S TUCKER, MONICA DAVID and PAM BONDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dan Schmidt v. Walter McNeil
as 10-10720
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAN SCHMIDT
Respondent - Appellee:
WALTER A. MCNEIL, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
SCHMIDT v. MCNEIL
as 5:2008cv00329
Petitioner:
DAN SCHMIDT
Respondent:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SCHMIDT v. MCNEIL
as 5:2008cv00146
Plaintiff:
DAN SCHMIDT
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
