Cases 1 - 10 of 23
PAPP et al v. DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
MIKO R PAPP and BRIAN PAPP
Defendant:
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC., DARDEN CONCEPTS, INC. and DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. doing business as YARD HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
GAITHER v. RARE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02371
Plaintiff:
WALTER GAITHER
Defendant:
RARE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL, INC., GMRI, INC., DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CLEAN TEXTILE SYSTEMS, L.P. v. GMRI, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
CLEAN TEXTILE SYSTEMS, L.P. doing business as CLEAN CARE
Defendant:
GMRI, INC. and DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv04452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00384
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
URDA v. DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
as 2:2018cv03282
Plaintiff:
NANCY URDA
Defendant:
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MELL v. DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. et al
as 5:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
ELLEN MELL
Defendant:
DARDEN RESTAURANTS, INC. , DARDEN RESTAURANTS OF PA MERGER CORP. and FCPT KEYSTONE PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
