Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Darnell Nolley v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme, et al
as 16-10330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICKY MYRICK, Director of the GDC's Investigations and Compliance Inmate Affairs Unit and others
NOLLEY v. DOE et al
as 3:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, BART SCOTT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOLLEY v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, RICKY MYRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolley et al v. Bryson et al
as 5:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
Darnell Nolley, Mark Davis, Gregory Ashley and others
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Thomas Gramiak, Edwina Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOLLEY v. GRAMIAK
as 3:2015cv00114
Petitioner:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Respondent:
THOMAS GRAMIAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nolley v. Bryson et al
as 4:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Darnell Nolley
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Gregory C. Dozier, Ricky Myrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Nolley v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme, et al
as 15-14294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF CORRETIONS, MACON SP WARDEN and others
Nolley v. Unnamed
as 4:2015cv00161
Plaintiff:
Darnell Nolley
Defendant:
Unnamed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOLLEY v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2015cv00324
Plaintiff:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, GREGORY C DOZIER, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOLLEY v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, RICKY MYRICK, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
