Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ricky Pendleton v. David Ballard
as 21-6380
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY VINCENT PENDLETON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Samuel Anstey v. Ralph Terry
as 19-7238
Respondent:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Respondent / Appellee:
RALPH TERRY, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMUEL ROBERT ANSTEY
Charles Lively v. David Ballard
as 17-7407
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES JASON LIVELY
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Randy Cordle v. Amanda Sabatino
as 17-7374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY CORDLE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMANDA SABATINO, LPN, JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner, WVDOC, KAREN PSZCZOLKOWSKI, Warden, Northern Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
JANE DOE, Nurse, Northern Correctional Facility Staff
Roger Harper v. David Ballard
as 15-6704
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER LEE HARPER
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
David Lawrence Dixon v. David Ballard
as 15-6669
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LAWRENCE DIXON
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Benny Roberts v. David Ballard
as 14-7556
Petitioner - Appellant:
BENNY RAY ROBERTS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Tex Holbrook, II v. David Ballard
as 13-6724
Petitioner - Appellant:
TEX HOLBROOK, II
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
James Estep v. David Ballard
as 11-6540
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES N. ESTEP
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Defendant:
DARRELL MCGRAW
Michael Hicks v. David Ballard
as 11-6453
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. HICKS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
