Cases 1 - 9 of 9
JOHNSON v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2018cv01574
Plaintiff:
MATRIYA-SHALAI JOHNSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DARIN WIGGS-HUGHES, CHRISTOPHER LI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Berks & Beyond Employment Services, Inc. et al v. Coleman
as 1:2017cv00365
Plaintiff:
Berks & Beyond Employment Services, Inc. and Elwood Staffing Services, Inc.
Defendant:
David Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
BELL et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2011cv04047
Plaintiff:
DAVID BELL, WILLIE F. BECKTON, VICTORIA DUPREE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv07421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
COLEMAN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88389
Plaintiff:
DAVID COLEMAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COLEMAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88387
Plaintiff:
DAVID COLEMAN and LUCILLE COLEMAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COLEMAN v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv90190
Plaintiff:
LUCILLE COLEMAN, LUCILLE COLEMAN, DAVID COLEMAN and others
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COLEMAN et al v. POTTSTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2009cv04179
Plaintiff:
JEAN COLEMAN, DAVID COLEMAN and RODNEY JONES
Defendant:
POTTSTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
