Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jean-Pierre Ronet v. Heston Silbert, et al
as 22-15942
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEAN-PIERRE RONET
Defendant / Appellee: HESTON SILBERT, Director, STEPHEN MORRISON, Administrative Service Manager, Arizona Department of Public Safety, in his official and individual capacity, DANIEL KILEY, Judge-Superior Court and others
Ronet v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
as 2:2021cv01677
Plaintiff: Jean-Pierre Ronet
Defendant: Arizona Department of Public Safety, Heston Stibert, Stephen Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01726
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dees v. US Collections West Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05895
Plaintiff: David Dees
Defendant: US Collections West Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dees v. E-Service Incorporated
as 2:2019cv05210
Plaintiff: David Dees
Defendant: E-Service Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dees v. IC System Incorporated
as 2:2019cv05212
Defendant: IC System Incorporated
Plaintiff: David Dees
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dees v. Resurgent Capital Services LP et al
as 2:2019cv02480
Defendant: Resurgent Capital Services LP and LVNV Funding LLC
Plaintiff: David Dees
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dees v. IQ Data International Incorporated
as 2:2017cv04489
Plaintiff: David Dees
Defendant: IQ Data International Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dees v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 2:2017cv04290
Plaintiff: David Dees
Defendant: GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dees v. Kemper & Associates LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01586
Plaintiff: David Dees
Defendant: Kemper & Associates LLC and Wilton K Caver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?