Cases 41 - 50 of 219
BARBER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2010cv00497
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE BARBER
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THOMAS ROWLANDS, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00406
Petitioner:
BERNARD LANE
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BATES v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2010cv00379
Petitioner:
GARY P. BATES
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, CHESTER CO. D.A. OFFICES and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STOVER v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00455
Petitioner:
GREGORY STOVER
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GINN v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00405
Petitioner:
ALLEN GINN
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REYES v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv00261
Petitioner:
ANGEL REYES
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and FRANKLIN J. TENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
POULSON v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00268
Petitioner:
CHARLES POULSON
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIBSON v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00266
Petitioner:
HOWARD GIBSON
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POLITE v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00156
Petitioner:
WILLIE E. POLITE
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DICKERSON v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DICKERSON
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
