Cases 1 - 3 of 3
RICKER v. SCI PINE GROVE et al
as 2:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
DAVID EDWARD RICKER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT SCI PINE GROVE, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, SUPERINTENDENT SCI PINE GROVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICKER v. ESTOCK et al
as 3:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
David Edward Ricker
Respondent:
L. J. Estock, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and District Attorney (of) Dauphin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICKER v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
DAVID EDWARD RICKER
Respondent:
L. J. ESTOCK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
