Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Flores v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv09764
Plaintiff:
David Flores
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv25901
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Valerie Flores v. Tiffany Topp, et al
as 26-2249
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. FLORES
Defendant:
TIFFANY TOPP, QHIVETTA HARRIS, ROBERTO PEREZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv61389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02374
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flores v. Topp
as 26-1186
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN GARCIA, TIFFANY TOPP, QHIVETTA HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. FLORES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01232
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Flores v. Topp et al
as 3:2026cv00326
Defendant:
Christian Garcia, Tiffany Topp, Qhivetta Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01399
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moran et al v. Gale
as 4:2026cv00023
Plaintiff:
Rene Moran and Redline Cargo
Defendant:
Samuel Kerksiek, Utah Department of Transportation, Beaver City Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
