Cases 1 - 10 of 95
David Flores Jr v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01168
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
David Flores, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Garcia-Perez v. Guerra
as 24-40128
Plaintiff:
Abel Garcia-Perez
Defendant:
J. E. "Eddie" Guerra, Sheriff, Jose R. Vasquez, Captain, David Flores, First Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28145
Plaintiff:
DAVID FLORES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22142
Plaintiff:
DAVID FLORES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13218
Plaintiff:
DAVID FLORES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FERMAN v. FLORES et al
as 2:2023cv16017
Plaintiff:
EVIN FERMAN
Defendant:
DAVID FLORES, DOCTOR, BECKY SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Garza et al
as 7:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lopez
Defendant:
Eddie Garza, Yvonne Vasquez, Hidalgo County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16618
Plaintiff:
DAVID FLORES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-20419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
