Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Qassis et al v. Methodist Healthcare Memphis Hospitals d/b/a Methodist Hospital and Le Bonheur Children's Hospital
as 2:2016cv02520
Defendant:
Methodist Healthcare Memphis Hospitals
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Qassis , Dayna Webster , Lillian Knox-Bender and others
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jones et al v. JRN, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Jones , Laqanda Jackson , Veronica Deloney and others
Defendant:
JRN, Inc., John R. Neal, David G. Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Edwards v. JRN, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Edith D. Edwards
Defendant:
JRN, Inc., John R. Neal, David G. Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Painters Union Deposit Fund v. Innovative Ceilings and Walls et al
as 2:2012cv14785
Plaintiff:
Painters Union Deposit Fund
Defendant:
Innovative Ceilings and Walls and David G Henwood
DeBolt et al v. Cassens Transport Co. et al
as 4:2011cv01227
Plaintiff:
Ronnie E. DeBolt , James Elliott , Alan G. Graybeal and others
Defendant:
Cassens Transport Company, Local 377 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers, Kevin Koubeck and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Painters Union Deposit Fund v. Innovative Ceilings & Walls, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv10812
Plaintiff:
Painters Union Deposit Fund
Defendant:
Innovative Ceilings & Walls, Inc. and David G Henwood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Painters Union Deposit Fund v. Innovative Ceilings & Walls, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv13091
Plaintiff:
Painters Union Deposit Fund
Defendant:
Innovative Ceilings & Walls, Inc. and David G Henwood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chao v. Construction Material, Incorporated
as 2:2008cv11702
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Construction Material, Incorporated, David G Cutler, Courtney Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
