Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gomez v. Willacy County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Daniel David Gomez
Defendant:
Willacy County Jail, Joe Salazar, Dominico Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez et al v. Mefra Fletes SA DE CV et al
as 1:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Gomez and Ronald Vasquez
Defendant:
Mefra Fletes SA DE CV and Alberto Guadalupe Alvarez Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gomez v. The State of Texas
as 1:2021cv00120
Petitioner:
Daniel David Gomez
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Gomez et al
as 4:2020cv02818
Defendant:
Davion Keener, David Gomez, Wilfrido Gomez and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gomez v. Salazar et al
as 5:2019cv01504
Plaintiff:
David Gomez
Defendant:
Sheriff Javier Salazar and Arresting Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Willacy County Jail
as 1:2019cv00170
Defendant:
Willacy County Jail
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bermea v. City of Harlingen, Texas et al
as 1:2018cv00149
Defendant:
Jose Herrera, Officer David Gomez, Jr., Officer Alan Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Moises Bermea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Southern Tire Mart, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv02068
Defendant:
Southern Tire Mart, LLC and Thomas M Duff
Plaintiff:
David Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Burns et al v. Hearst Newspapers, LLC dba The Houston Chronicle
as 4:2013cv02747
Defendant:
Hearst Newspapers, LLC dba The Houston Chronicle
Plaintiff:
James Burns, David Gomez and Janie Crittle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gomez v. Stephens
as 1:2013cv00096
Petitioner:
Daniel David Gomez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
