Cases 1 - 10 of 14
HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13028
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID HAMILTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06812
Plaintiff:
DAVID HAMILTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KONO v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04684
Plaintiff:
CASEY KONO, DAVID VELASQUEZ, JONATHAN GRIFFITH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. David Sharpe
as 21-13574
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID HAMILTON SHARPE, a.k.a. David Dukkedoff
HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36634
Plaintiff:
DAVID HAMILTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv06151
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Bennett et al
as 4:2020cv00309
Defendant:
Clerk Patricia S. Connor, Ms. Christa T. Bell, David Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Randall Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv10723
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv72329
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv57470
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
