Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Barnes v. Harris et al
as 2:2012cv01010
Plaintiff:
J. Canute Barnes
Defendant:
Curtis H. Harris , Ned H. Giles , David N. Barnes and others
Intervenor:
FDIC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
BNSF Railway Company et al v. Jordan et al
as 5:2012cv04069
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company , Cimarron Valley Railroad, LC , Kansas & Oklahoma Railroad, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Nick Jordan and David N. Harper
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503
Stanley v. Gallegos, et al.
as 1:2011cv01108
Plaintiff:
David N Stanley
Defendant:
Donald Gallegos and Ed Olona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2011cv00331
Plaintiff:
David N Ewing
Defendant:
Gary M Gilbert and The Law Offices of Gary M. Gilbert & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Rogers v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01760
Plaintiff:
David N. Rogers, David N. Rogers and David N. Rogers
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hinton v. Dennis et al
as 4:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
Darryl L Hinton
Defendant:
James Dennis, Joe S Vassar, David N Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. City of Woodland Park, The et al
as 1:2009cv01102
Plaintiff:
Tricia L. Mullins
Defendant:
City of Woodland Park, The, Gary Crane, Phil Mella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
York v. Pierce et al
as 2:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Leilani York, Leilani York and Leilani York
Defendant:
David N. Pierce, Dennis B. Goldstein, Arnold S. Grundvig, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
