Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Firewalker-Fields v. Elam et al
as 1:2021cv01113
Plaintiff:
David N. Firewalker-Fields
Defendant:
Marcus Elam, Ivan Gilmore and Ms. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Firewalker-Fields v. I. et al
as 1:2020cv01338
Defendant:
J. Adams, E. Boone, Patrick Jones and others
Plaintiff:
David N. Firewalker-Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Firewalker-Fields v. Clarke
as 1:2020cv00806
Petitioner:
David N. Firewalker-Fields
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Firewalker-Fields v. Clarke et al
as 1:2019cv00626
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Israel Hamilton, Barry Morano and others
Plaintiff:
David N. Firewalker-Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Firewalker-Fields v. Robertson et al
as 1:2016cv00479
Plaintiff:
David N. Firewalker-Fields
Defendant:
S. Robertson, E. Shaw and W. Jaratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knowlin v. Clarke et al
as 1:2013cv00994
Plaintiff:
Lee R. Knowlin
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, William Muse, Keren Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Fahey et al
as 3:2007cv00374
Petitioner:
Howard Frank Neal
Respondent:
Helen Fahey, Carol Ann Sievers, Herbert V. Couton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Headley v. Fahey et al
as 2:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
Federico J. Headley
Defendant:
Helen F. Fahey, David N. Harker, Carol Ann Siever and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harker et al
as 2:2007cv00092
Plaintiff:
Michael Sewell Smith
Defendant:
David N. Harker, Carol Ann Sievers, Jim Sisk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Jackson
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Helen F. Fahey, David N. Harker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
