Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Garcia Vasquez v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv20947
Plaintiff:
Jovanna Garcia Vasquez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Garcia Vasquez v. United States Postal Service et al
as 9:2024cv80274
Plaintiff:
Jovanna Garcia Vasquez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27590
Plaintiff:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25339
Plaintiff:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15377
Plaintiff:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06984
Plaintiff:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHT, JEREMY JACKSON, LEE ASH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05492
Plaintiff:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Rodriguez v. Mena Hospital Commission
as 2:2023cv02002
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Mena Hospital Commission doing business as Mena Regional Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
