Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Arnett v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Joshua C Arnett
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, David W Prater, Cameron M Burwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kalbaugh v. Holt et al
as 5:2020cv00280
Defendant:
David Holt, Wade Gourley, Oklahoma City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Duke Kalbaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Prater et al
as 5:2018cv00585
Plaintiff:
George Cintroi Raavon Davis, III
Defendant:
David W Prater, Samantha Duncan, Kelly Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Collins et al
as 5:2017cv00645
Plaintiff:
George Cintroi Raavon Davis, III
Defendant:
Kelly Collins, Samantha Duncan, Cindy Troung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coots v. Oklahoma County et al
as 5:2016cv00818
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Coots
Defendant:
Oklahoma County, David W Prater, Cleveland County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prater v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05567
Plaintiff:
David W Prater
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. District Court of Oklahoma, et al
as 16-6018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY EARL PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY and DAVID W. PRATER
Parker v. Oklahoma District Court, et al
as 16-6007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY E. PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA COUNTY DISTRICT COURT and DAVID W. PRATER, District Attorney Oklahoma County OKC
Parker v. Oklahoma County District Court et al
as 5:2015cv01240
Plaintiff:
Billy E Parker
Defendant:
Oklahoma County District Court and David W Prater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
