Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DAVITA INC. v. ST. JOSEPH'S/CANDLER HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
as 4:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
DAVITA INC.
Defendant:
ST. JOSEPH'S/CANDLER HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Goede et al v. Davita, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03228
Plaintiff:
Kelli Goede and Jason Goede
Defendant:
Davita, Inc., Homechoice Healthcare, H & P Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davita Inc. et al v. Payor Reimbursement Negotiators Inc
as 5:2010mc00007
Plaintiff:
Davita Inc.
Defendant:
Payor Reimbursement Negotiators Inc
Movant:
Secure Health Plans of Georgia LLC, Secure Health Plans of Georgia LLC and Secure Health Plans of Georgia LLC
Spain v. Davita Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Charles Spain
Defendant:
Davita Inc., Clement Chigasa Nwosu and Middle Georgia Nephrology Associates Limited Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
IN RE: The United States of America and DaVIta Inc.
as 1:2009mi00164
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Movant:
Charles J. McAllister
Cause Of Action: FRCP 27 Motion to Perpetuate Testimony
United States of America Ex Rel et al v. Davita, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02509
Plaintiff:
United States of America Ex Rel, Alon J. Vainer, Daniel D. Barbir and others
Defendant:
Davita, Inc., Gambro Healthcare, Inc., Gambro AB and others
Respondent:
Bondurant Mixson & Elmore LLP, Gibbs & Bruns and Grant J Harvey
Petitioner:
Union County Dialysis, LLC, Vainer & Vainer Nephrology Consultants, Inc. and Dialysis of Georgia, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
James Richard Tetley, II
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
