Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Stewart v. Dominicis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv03058
Plaintiff: Wayne Anthony Stewart
Defendant: Jorge A. Dominicis, Jerry Boyle, Amie Fabah-Ezeogu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold (PS) v. Bent County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff: David Ray Arnold
Defendant: Bent County Jail, Broady, Jake Six and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Six et al
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff: Mickie LeeFox and Mickie Lee Fox
Defendant: Jake Six, Lane Elliot, Brodie Snover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stang v. USA
as 2:2021cv00345
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Joe Dee Stang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Oblad v. Parrish et al
as 2:2020cv00732
Defendant: Sean Reyes, Judge Dee Benson, SLC Metro Jail and others
Plaintiff: Brian Oblad
Not Classified By Court: Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sharp
as 4:2020cv00380
Respondent: State of Oklahoma and Tommy Sharp
Petitioner: Billy Dee Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tolbert v. Thayer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00269
Defendant: Catherine Zarkos, Dee A Sanchez, Ann Halter and others
Plaintiff: Curtis Auburn Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pachta v. Judd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00030
Defendant: Centurion LLC, All Security Staff, Trinity Food Provider and others
Plaintiff: Glen Dee Pachta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. No Named Respondents
as 1:2018cv02639
Respondent: No Named Respondents
Petitioner: Richard Dee Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Laintz v. Correctional Health Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02122
Defendant: John Simmers, Streyle, Garnes and others
Plaintiff: Jeremy Laintz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?